Skip to content

Finnish stemmer benchmarks ★★★★★

This page reports same-language stemming benchmarks for Finnish. Accuracy is listed first because speed without root agreement is not enough to interpret stemmer quality.

Dictionary size: ★★★★★. The exact count is 1,788,784 distinct usable word forms after parser-compatible filtering and exact, case-preserved deduplication. Stars rank dictionary size relative to all benchmarked dictionaries in five nearly equal groups; they do not measure linguistic quality or benchmark accuracy.

All speed values are environment-specific and were measured on the hardware and JVM listed in the benchmark overview. The command distribution, exact-root accuracy, and speed tables belong to the published 2026-09-11 Radixor/Java 4.4.0 snapshot. Speed benchmark operations process changed tokens. Accuracy uses the complete Radixor dictionary for the language.

How to read this page

Start with the corpus and patch-command distribution, then compare exact-root agreement with runtime. The dictionary-family experiment, edit-cost experiment, and pairwise linguistic evaluation answer separate questions. Their 10–90% curves use independent frozen protocols and must not be substituted for one another.

Runtime and exact-root agreement measure different properties. Light, minimal, possessive, and other rule-based filters intentionally have different transformation scopes, so a lower runtime can coexist with lower dictionary-root agreement. Read the speed and accuracy tables together. The Radixor rows in this refresh use the contracted compiled patch trie: compilation collapses uniform patch-command subtrees into accepting leaves, reducing hot lookup depth while preserving the preferred stemming result measured by the accuracy pass. The EnglishRadixorDictionaryCoverageBenchmark shows the resulting quality/speed envelope explicitly.

Dictionary corpus

Model ID Model version Language Dictionary rows Distinct usable forms Complete quality tokens Already-root tokens Changed tokens Timing workload JMH timing tokens
fi-fi-default 1.0.0 FI_FI 57,027 1,788,784 1,865,215 110,525 1,754,690 changed tokens 1,754,690

Radixor patch-command distribution

Radixor stores the preferred transformation for each normalized dictionary word form as a compiled patch command. This distribution shows which runtime command class is selected by the trained trie for the complete default-model dictionary. The total number of preferred patch commands analyzed for this language is 1,865,215.

Command class Meaning Word forms Share
AppendCharacterCommand Appends one character to the end of the word form. 1,117 0.060%
BackwardCompoundCommand Applies a multi-step backward patch made from skip, delete, insert, and replace operations. 1,175,880 63.043%
DeleteSuffixCommand Deletes one or more trailing characters from the word form. 570,130 30.566%
PreserveCommand Returns the word form unchanged because it already matches the preferred root. 112,029 6.006%
ReplaceLastCharacterCommand Replaces the final character of the word form. 6,059 0.325%

Accuracy

Accuracy is computed from JMH auxiliary counters in the current report. The counters are deterministic for a fixed corpus and stemmer; percentages divide matching counters by evaluated counters from the same report and are not timing metrics.

Stemmer All exact Changed exact Root preserved Note
Radixor 98.661% 98.803% 96.408% Radixor dictionary-trained patch-command stemmer.
Lucene SnowballFilter 10.991% 10.268% 22.471% Lucene TokenFilter integration path around the Snowball algorithm.
Official Snowball direct (Java) 10.995% 10.272% 22.462% Official Snowball generated Java stemmer; rule-based suffix algorithm.
Lucene FinnishLightStemFilter 4.351% 4.294% 5.264% Light suffix stemmer; intentionally narrower than Radixor's dictionary-trained transformation model.

Speed

Speed uses JMH average time, 3 warmup iterations, 5 measurement iterations, 3 independent forks, and 1 thread. Relative factor is computed against the single Radixor row on this language page. Values below 1.000 are faster than that Radixor baseline; values above 1.000 are slower.

Stemmer Benchmark method Score ms/op Error ms ns/token Relative vs Radixor Note
Radixor radixor[fi-fi-default] 319.225 37.162 181.9 1.000 Radixor dictionary-trained patch-command stemmer.
Lucene FinnishLightStemFilter finnishLuceneFinnishLightStemFilter 172.157 7.533 98.1 0.539 Light Finnish suffix stemmer.
Official Snowball direct (Java) snowballDirect[FINNISH] 303.292 15.272 172.8 0.950 Official Snowball generated Java stemmer; direct API. The reported Radixor and Snowball 99.9% JMH intervals overlap; this summary does not support a directional conclusion, and the runtime ratio remains a point estimate.
Lucene SnowballFilter luceneSnowballFilter[FINNISH] 336.525 18.502 191.8 1.054 Lucene TokenFilter path around Snowball; includes TokenStream overhead.

Interpretation notes

  • Radixor is a dictionary-trained patch-command stemmer. Its learned transformations can generalize beyond the word forms listed in the training resource.
  • Light, minimal, plural, and possessive filters are narrow baselines. They can be fast because they intentionally perform less linguistic work.
  • Lucene TokenFilter rows include TokenStream, attribute, and required normalization overhead. Direct rows measure exposed direct APIs.
  • Morfologik rows are dictionary-based and can emit multiple terms for one input token. Quality rows use the first returned term when no ranking weight is available.
  • Snowball rows are rule-based generated suffix stemmers; they are useful algorithmic baselines, not dictionary-root equivalence guarantees.

Dictionary-family generalization conclusion

This is the language-specific conclusion from the independent radixor-generalization-v1 baseline experiment. It is intentionally separate from the wider edit-cost protocol below; values from the two frozen snapshots are not substituted for one another.

Evidence

Model fi-fi-default version 1.0.0 is evaluated over five predeclared nested splits. Unseen metrics remove withheld occurrences whose normalized surface also appeared in training. Parentheses show the observed split minimum–maximum.

Training rows Median unseen occurrences Unseen all exact Unseen changed exact Unseen root preserved
10% 1,672,373 79.210% (78.547–79.594) 78.644% (77.966–79.067) 88.247% (87.860–88.496)
20% 1,481,274 81.958% (81.525–81.970) 81.481% (81.032–81.508) 89.459% (89.355–89.678)
30% 1,292,480 83.290% (82.866–83.366) 82.848% (82.399–82.936) 90.499% (90.312–90.537)
40% 1,103,628 83.991% (83.783–84.165) 83.556% (83.313–83.715) 91.299% (91.199–91.628)
50% 917,680 84.681% (84.520–84.723) 84.232% (84.039–84.280) 92.203% (92.123–92.566)
60% 730,977 85.172% (85.110–85.293) 84.708% (84.639–84.829) 93.033% (92.895–93.427)
70% 546,876 85.689% (85.586–85.804) 85.219% (85.114–85.335) 93.710% (93.575–93.808)
80% 363,208 86.152% (86.055–86.432) 85.686% (85.568–85.979) 94.265% (94.183–94.726)
90% 181,248 86.644% (86.280–86.823) 86.177% (85.790–86.342) 94.835% (94.730–95.762)

Generalization conclusion

  • Median exactness on genuinely unseen changed forms moves from 78.644% at 10% training knowledge to 86.177% at 90%, a measured +7.532 percentage-point change.
  • Unseen all-form exactness moves from 79.210% at 10% training knowledge to 86.644% at 90%, a measured +7.434 percentage-point change.
  • Preservation of unseen already-root forms moves from 88.247% at 10% training knowledge to 94.835% at 90%, a measured +6.588 percentage-point change.
  • The evidence establishes within-resource transfer across withheld dictionary families. It does not estimate unrelated domains, misspellings, arbitrary compounds, or external corpora.

The complete ten-level table and split ranges remain in the complete generalization appendix; raw counters and provenance are in active machine-readable snapshot. The frozen methodology defines family-level splitting, unseen-surface leakage control, aggregation, and the limits of the claim.

Edit costs and dictionary-knowledge generalization

This section interprets the edit-cost and held-out-family experiment for FI_FI separately from the cross-language macro summary. Each knowledge point is the median of five frozen, nested splits. The primary exactness outcome covers changed forms in withheld families after excluding normalized surfaces seen in training. Thus the complete dictionary is the evaluation population, while only genuinely unseen surfaces contribute to this outcome.

Cost labels have the fixed form D<delete>I<insert>R<replace>M<match>. D is the cost of deleting a source character, I of inserting a target character, R of replacing a source character, and M of keeping an equal source/target character unchanged (the match or skip step). For example, D2I5R3M0 means delete cost 2, insert cost 5, replace cost 3, and match cost 0. The numbers are relative dynamic-programming costs, not command counts.

Evidence

Dictionary rows Evaluated forms Changed-form share Baseline commands Exact cost classes Grid reduction Largest exact class
57,027 1,865,215 94.07% 2,683 7 33.43× 110

The exact classes are based on command-by-command equality over the complete dictionary, not equality of aggregate trie metrics. A higher class count means that this dictionary exposes more cost-dependent encoder decisions; it does not by itself mean better quality.

Knowledge Baseline unseen changed exact Selected-cost exact Δ Baseline F0.5 Selected F0.5 Baseline commands Selected commands
10% 78.695% 78.695% -0.000 pp 0.9236 0.9237 1.000× 0.734×
20% 81.330% 81.341% +0.011 pp 0.9343 0.9344 1.000× 0.728×
30% 82.603% 82.606% +0.003 pp 0.9390 0.9390 1.000× 0.730×
40% 83.524% 83.527% +0.004 pp 0.9426 0.9426 1.000× 0.736×
50% 84.138% 84.143% +0.005 pp 0.9454 0.9455 1.000× 0.727×
60% 84.797% 84.799% +0.002 pp 0.9478 0.9478 1.000× 0.735×
70% 85.184% 85.188% +0.004 pp 0.9494 0.9494 1.000× 0.741×
80% 85.673% 85.678% +0.005 pp 0.9513 0.9514 1.000× 0.749×
90% 85.707% 85.709% +0.002 pp 0.9517 0.9517 1.000× 0.750×

Within-language associations

Spearman coefficients are calculated independently inside each seed × knowledge stratum across the normalized cost grid. The table reports the median and central 95% empirical interval across up to 45 strata. A relationship is called stable only when it is defined in all 45 strata and the interval retains one sign. These intervals are descriptive, not multiplicity-adjusted confidence intervals. Every predictor and outcome label is defined in the methodology glossary.

The strongest structural pairs whose central interval retains one sign are:

Predictor Structural outcome Median Spearman ρ Central 95% Strata
replace_to_delete_insert logical_leaf_paths +0.766 +0.503…+0.766 45
replace_cost logical_leaf_paths +0.670 +0.456…+0.670 45
edit_cost_imbalance trie_edges -0.279 -0.279…-0.274 45
replace_to_delete_insert average_path_length -0.258 -0.504…-0.258 45
delete_cost average_path_length +0.240 +0.240…+0.303 45
insert_cost average_path_length +0.240 +0.240…+0.303 45

For each quality outcome, the largest absolute median association is shown even when its interval crosses zero. This prevents a large median in heterogeneous strata from being misreported as a portable language-level effect.

Predictor Quality outcome Median Spearman ρ Central 95% Stable Defined strata
logical_leaf_paths unseen_changed_exact -0.875 -1.000…+0.360 no 44 / 45
average_path_length unseen_f05 -0.828 -0.992…+0.720 no 45 / 45
replace_to_delete_insert unseen_over_percent -0.587 -0.887…+0.407 no 30 / 45
logical_leaf_paths unseen_under_percent +0.890 -0.163…+1.000 no 45 / 45

Edit-cost conclusion

  • With baseline costs, median unseen changed-form exactness changes from 78.695% at 10% knowledge to 85.707% at 90%, a +7.012 pp measured knowledge effect.
  • The predeclared selection is D10I10R1M1. Its median unseen changed-form exactness differs from baseline by +0.005 pp and it reduces the median retained-command count by 26.37% (0.736× baseline).
  • Under the selected costs, the 10%–90% knowledge change is +7.014 pp. This quantifies generalization for this dictionary; it is not a claim about unrelated domains or lexical resources.
  • The non-baseline setting is an efficiency candidate, not a production default: it was selected and evaluated on the same matrix and therefore requires external-corpus or external-dictionary validation before adoption.
  • 2 cost/representation-to-quality association(s) are defined in all 45 strata and retain one sign over their central 95% interval. Their direction is evidence for this resource only; inspect the table and machine-readable coefficients before extrapolating.

The complete evidence is available in the raw logical matrix, the per-language knowledge curves, and the per-language association table. See the cross-language analysis and frozen methodology for scope and limitations.

Stemming quality

Runtime performance and linguistic grouping quality are independent dimensions. This section evaluates language FI_FI using the complete validated stemming-quality result matrix and the canonical linguistic-quality methodology, including its overlapping-group relation, dictionary modes, output policies, metrics, and ranking rules.

Radixor's model was trained from the same lexical resource that defines this benchmark's dictionary-reference relation. The result therefore measures same-resource agreement, not independent external linguistic validity. Third-party adapters receive the same evaluated forms but were not trained by this benchmark.

The tables retain both canonical dictionary-processing modes and every applicable output policy without redefining them on each language page. Download the complete machine-readable result snapshot.

Evaluation scope and key findings

The default model is fi-fi-default, loaded from classpath resource org/egothor/stemmer/models/fi-fi-default/stemmer.gz. The following findings compare only deterministic PRIMARY_OUTPUT rows over identical included groups; candidate policies are reported separately as capability analyses.

  • ALL_WORDS: Radixor ranks first by balanced accuracy at 0.984838 among 4 deterministic stemmers. The runner-up is SNOWBALL FINNISH LUCENE FILTER at 0.740279, a difference of 0.244559. This rank does not imply leadership in throughput or every secondary metric.
  • LOWERCASE_GROUPS_ONLY: Radixor ranks first by balanced accuracy at 0.988242 among 4 deterministic stemmers. The runner-up is SNOWBALL FINNISH DIRECT at 0.738543, a difference of 0.249699. This rank does not imply leadership in throughput or every secondary metric.

ALL_WORDS

This mode contains 6 result rows, 4 evaluated stemmers, and 3 output policies. Applied-row and form counts are shown per row because adapters share the language corpus but policy rows remain independently auditable. Where at least two deterministic rows are available, PRIMARY_OUTPUT and ALL_CANDIDATES rankings are ordered by unrounded balanced accuracy, followed by MCC, F1, over-stemming rate, over-stemming count, under-stemming rate, and stemmer. ANY_CANDIDATE has no single rank metric and is listed alphabetically. Balanced accuracy is a navigation metric, not a universally authoritative quality score.

PRIMARY_OUTPUT ranking

Rank Stemmer Balanced accuracy Over-stemming (OI) Under-stemming (UI)
1 Radixor 0.984838 <0.000001% 3.032474%
2 SNOWBALL FINNISH LUCENE FILTER 0.740279 0.000081% 51.944179%
3 SNOWBALL FINNISH DIRECT 0.739870 0.000060% 52.025976%
4 FINNISH LUCENE FINNISH LIGHT STEM FILTER 0.695725 0.000094% 60.854936%
Classification metrics
Rank Stemmer Output policy Precision Recall Specificity Balanced accuracy Pairwise accuracy Error rate
1 Radixor PRIMARY_OUTPUT 0.999974 0.969675 1.000000 0.984838 0.999999 0.000001
2 SNOWBALL FINNISH LUCENE FILTER PRIMARY_OUTPUT 0.921471 0.480558 0.999999 0.740279 0.999989 0.000011
3 SNOWBALL FINNISH DIRECT PRIMARY_OUTPUT 0.940647 0.479740 0.999999 0.739870 0.999989 0.000011
4 FINNISH LUCENE FINNISH LIGHT STEM FILTER PRIMARY_OUTPUT 0.890914 0.391451 0.999999 0.695725 0.999987 0.000013
Pair-relation metrics
Rank Stemmer Output policy F0.5 F1 F2 Jaccard Fowlkes–Mallows MCC
1 Radixor PRIMARY_OUTPUT 0.993763 0.984591 0.975587 0.969650 0.984708 0.984708
2 SNOWBALL FINNISH LUCENE FILTER PRIMARY_OUTPUT 0.778598 0.631685 0.531413 0.461652 0.665448 0.665443
3 SNOWBALL FINNISH DIRECT PRIMARY_OUTPUT 0.789035 0.635413 0.531862 0.465645 0.671764 0.671760
4 FINNISH LUCENE FINNISH LIGHT STEM FILTER PRIMARY_OUTPUT 0.709787 0.543915 0.440884 0.373546 0.590550 0.590545
Raw pair counts
Rank Stemmer Output policy TP FP FN TN Over error / possible Under error / possible
1 Radixor PRIMARY_OUTPUT 30511413 804 954186 1599841738533 804 / 1599841739337 954186 / 31465599
2 SNOWBALL FINNISH LUCENE FILTER PRIMARY_OUTPUT 15121052 1288634 16344547 1599840450703 1288634 / 1599841739337 16344547 / 31465599
3 SNOWBALL FINNISH DIRECT PRIMARY_OUTPUT 15095314 952479 16370285 1599840786858 952479 / 1599841739337 16370285 / 31465599
4 FINNISH LUCENE FINNISH LIGHT STEM FILTER PRIMARY_OUTPUT 12317229 1508153 19148370 1599840231184 1508153 / 1599841739337 19148370 / 31465599

ANY_CANDIDATE oracle bounds

These results are measured, not missing. ANY_CANDIDATE answers two separate optimistic questions for each pair: a gold-related pair avoids under-stemming when the candidate sets intersect, while a gold-negative pair avoids over-stemming when some non-colliding candidate selection exists. The oracle may choose a different candidate for the same word in different pairs. Consequently, these decisions do not form one globally realizable predicted relation or one TP/FP/FN/TN confusion matrix. Balanced accuracy, F-scores, Jaccard, Fowlkes–Mallows, and MCC are therefore mathematically not applicable, rather than unknown.

Stemmer Optimistic over-stemming (OI) Optimistic under-stemming (UI)
Radixor 0.000000% 0.000000%
Oracle-bound pair counts
Stemmer Unavoidable over errors / gold-negative pairs Unrepairable under errors / gold-related pairs
Radixor 0 / 1599841739337 0 / 31465599

ALL_CANDIDATES result (no same-language comparator)

Rank Stemmer Balanced accuracy Over-stemming (OI) Under-stemming (UI)
n/a Radixor 1.000000 <0.000001% 0.000000%
Classification metrics
Rank Stemmer Output policy Precision Recall Specificity Balanced accuracy Pairwise accuracy Error rate
n/a Radixor ALL_CANDIDATES 0.999926 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 0.000000
Pair-relation metrics
Rank Stemmer Output policy F0.5 F1 F2 Jaccard Fowlkes–Mallows MCC
n/a Radixor ALL_CANDIDATES 0.999941 0.999963 0.999985 0.999926 0.999963 0.999963
Raw pair counts
Rank Stemmer Output policy TP FP FN TN Over error / possible Under error / possible
n/a Radixor ALL_CANDIDATES 31465599 2327 0 1599841737010 2327 / 1599841739337 0 / 31465599

Multi-output analysis

Alternative candidates are capability analyses, not replacements for the deterministic comparison.

Stemmer Under pairs repaired Best-case over pairs avoided All-candidate collisions added Multi-candidate forms Multi-candidate share Maximum candidates Total candidate assignments
Radixor 954186 804 1523 34395 1.922815% 6 1826768

LOWERCASE_GROUPS_ONLY

This mode contains 6 result rows, 4 evaluated stemmers, and 3 output policies. Applied-row and form counts are shown per row because adapters share the language corpus but policy rows remain independently auditable. Where at least two deterministic rows are available, PRIMARY_OUTPUT and ALL_CANDIDATES rankings are ordered by unrounded balanced accuracy, followed by MCC, F1, over-stemming rate, over-stemming count, under-stemming rate, and stemmer. ANY_CANDIDATE has no single rank metric and is listed alphabetically. Balanced accuracy is a navigation metric, not a universally authoritative quality score.

PRIMARY_OUTPUT ranking

Rank Stemmer Balanced accuracy Over-stemming (OI) Under-stemming (UI)
1 Radixor 0.988242 <0.000001% 2.351587%
2 SNOWBALL FINNISH DIRECT 0.738543 0.000062% 52.291340%
3 SNOWBALL FINNISH LUCENE FILTER 0.738344 0.000062% 52.331112%
4 FINNISH LUCENE FINNISH LIGHT STEM FILTER 0.694308 0.000077% 61.138333%
Classification metrics
Rank Stemmer Output policy Precision Recall Specificity Balanced accuracy Pairwise accuracy Error rate
1 Radixor PRIMARY_OUTPUT 0.999973 0.976484 1.000000 0.988242 1.000000 0.000000
2 SNOWBALL FINNISH DIRECT PRIMARY_OUTPUT 0.939988 0.477087 0.999999 0.738543 0.999989 0.000011
3 SNOWBALL FINNISH LUCENE FILTER PRIMARY_OUTPUT 0.939951 0.476689 0.999999 0.738344 0.999989 0.000011
4 FINNISH LUCENE FINNISH LIGHT STEM FILTER PRIMARY_OUTPUT 0.911893 0.388617 0.999999 0.694308 0.999987 0.000013
Pair-relation metrics
Rank Stemmer Output policy F0.5 F1 F2 Jaccard Fowlkes–Mallows MCC
1 Radixor PRIMARY_OUTPUT 0.995185 0.988089 0.981093 0.976459 0.988159 0.988159
2 SNOWBALL FINNISH DIRECT PRIMARY_OUTPUT 0.787224 0.632932 0.529209 0.462985 0.669668 0.669664
3 SNOWBALL FINNISH LUCENE FILTER PRIMARY_OUTPUT 0.786987 0.632573 0.528815 0.462601 0.669376 0.669372
4 FINNISH LUCENE FINNISH LIGHT STEM FILTER PRIMARY_OUTPUT 0.718421 0.544981 0.438999 0.374553 0.595296 0.595291
Raw pair counts
Rank Stemmer Output policy TP FP FN TN Over error / possible Under error / possible
1 Radixor PRIMARY_OUTPUT 30037514 804 723369 1504706134249 804 / 1504706135053 723369 / 30760883
2 SNOWBALL FINNISH DIRECT PRIMARY_OUTPUT 14675605 936938 16085278 1504705198115 936938 / 1504706135053 16085278 / 30760883
3 SNOWBALL FINNISH LUCENE FILTER PRIMARY_OUTPUT 14663371 936765 16097512 1504705198288 936765 / 1504706135053 16097512 / 30760883
4 FINNISH LUCENE FINNISH LIGHT STEM FILTER PRIMARY_OUTPUT 11954192 1155011 18806691 1504704980042 1155011 / 1504706135053 18806691 / 30760883

ANY_CANDIDATE oracle bounds

These results are measured, not missing. ANY_CANDIDATE answers two separate optimistic questions for each pair: a gold-related pair avoids under-stemming when the candidate sets intersect, while a gold-negative pair avoids over-stemming when some non-colliding candidate selection exists. The oracle may choose a different candidate for the same word in different pairs. Consequently, these decisions do not form one globally realizable predicted relation or one TP/FP/FN/TN confusion matrix. Balanced accuracy, F-scores, Jaccard, Fowlkes–Mallows, and MCC are therefore mathematically not applicable, rather than unknown.

Stemmer Optimistic over-stemming (OI) Optimistic under-stemming (UI)
Radixor 0.000000% 0.000000%
Oracle-bound pair counts
Stemmer Unavoidable over errors / gold-negative pairs Unrepairable under errors / gold-related pairs
Radixor 0 / 1504706135053 0 / 30760883

ALL_CANDIDATES result (no same-language comparator)

Rank Stemmer Balanced accuracy Over-stemming (OI) Under-stemming (UI)
n/a Radixor 1.000000 <0.000001% 0.000000%
Classification metrics
Rank Stemmer Output policy Precision Recall Specificity Balanced accuracy Pairwise accuracy Error rate
n/a Radixor ALL_CANDIDATES 0.999927 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 0.000000
Pair-relation metrics
Rank Stemmer Output policy F0.5 F1 F2 Jaccard Fowlkes–Mallows MCC
n/a Radixor ALL_CANDIDATES 0.999942 0.999964 0.999985 0.999927 0.999964 0.999964
Raw pair counts
Rank Stemmer Output policy TP FP FN TN Over error / possible Under error / possible
n/a Radixor ALL_CANDIDATES 30760883 2235 0 1504706132818 2235 / 1504706135053 0 / 30760883

Multi-output analysis

Alternative candidates are capability analyses, not replacements for the deterministic comparison.

Stemmer Under pairs repaired Best-case over pairs avoided All-candidate collisions added Multi-candidate forms Multi-candidate share Maximum candidates Total candidate assignments
Radixor 723369 804 1431 22060 1.271628% 6 1758300

Method and interpretation boundaries

The linguistic-quality methodology defines the overlapping gold relation, both dictionary-processing modes, all three output policies, confusion counts, formulas, undefined denominators, aggregation, ranking, and inapplicable partition metrics. The candidate-policy reference explains why ANY_CANDIDATE is an oracle-assisted capability bound rather than deterministic runtime behavior.

This page preserves the language-specific raw counts, metrics, candidate distributions, comparison availability, and caveats. The machine-readable CSV remains authoritative for every field.

Provenance

  • Authoritative source: docs/benchmarks/data/stemming-quality-2026-09-13.csv
  • Source SHA-256: d41e00160cda44758e806c37d210f2d9b90b1ebad22eebe5ece89a40f4ed9ab0
  • Evaluation command: ./gradlew stemmingQuality --no-daemon
  • Dictionary language: FI_FI
  • Processing modes: ALL_WORDS, LOWERCASE_GROUPS_ONLY
  • Stemmer versions and transitive artifacts: resolved by the repository's JMH Gradle configuration and gradle.lockfile
  • Model ID, version, and SHA-256: recorded in every CSV row
  • Run date, core source state, JDK, operating system, and hardware: recorded on the benchmark environment page